Ashley asks how time and pacing help reinforce the “reality
effect.” The “reality effect” “explains that something that seems unmediated
seems and, therefore, becomes more ‘real.’”
To examine this question, I again
want to refer to Eugene Minkowski's quote: “the essence
of life is not a feeling of being, of existence, but a feeling of participation
in a flowing onward, necessarily expressed in terms of time, and secondarily
expressed in terms of space" (from Bachelard's The
Poetics of Space). A piece of
artwork becomes more “real” therefore, when this “feeling of participation” is
shared between the performer/s and audience.
Last night I watched the HBO
documentary “the Artist is Present.” "The Artist is
Present," was a 736-hour and 30-minute static, silent piece, in which Marina
Abramavic sat immobile in the museum's atrium while spectators were invited to
take turns sitting opposite her (wikipedia).
We have discussed this is class
and so I won’t bother giving a deeper explanation of her work. What I would
like to highlight is something that occurred two months into her performance. One
day in late April, just as the museum was closing, Marina decided to do away with the table that stood in-between
the two chairs. She said later that this removal made the connection between
her and the people sitting opposite her, more vulnerable and immediate.
I thought about this documentary
as I read Ashley’s post. Most of us live lives mediated through meaning. It is very
rare that we share in an immediate participation in the flow of life. I would argue that "art" in its purist form, attempts to break through these layers of mediation in order to bring one face
to face with the mystery of existence. How is this possible?
In the Twitter plays, the point is to accurately
re-produce life “real-time.” Twitter theatre can reproduce a more thorough
realism because “the means by which one observes and interacts with characters
is in face identical to the ways one follows the lives of actual friends.”
Forced Entertainment, on the other hand, uses long performances in order "to place the audience in a world rather than describing one." It seeks "a theatre that disrupts the borders between the so-called real
and the so-called fictional.” One way that this is achieved is quite simple: the
long duration of these performances cannot but result in the exhaustion of the
performers. Audiences therefore, are not watching actors “pretend” to be tired,
but real exhaustion.
Marina is an awesome example of someone who makes their art more interesting than life. By manipulating time, she actually makes herself more present than she is in the everyday. She is not an artist of the "theatre of the every day" because she is not trying to replicate anything. She is just trying to be. Thanks, Tim!
ReplyDelete